The Elusive Search for the Thylacine: Sightings, Paw Prints, and the Hans Naarding Encounter

Since its presumed extinction in 1936, the Thylacine, or Tasmanian Tiger (Thylacinus cynocephalus), has captivated the imaginations of wildlife enthusiasts, cryptozoologists, and scientists alike. Despite the death of the last confirmed Thylacine, Benjamin, at Hobart Zoo on September 7th, 1936, reported sightings and tantalizing evidence of the species’ survival have persisted for decades. These clues include paw prints, hair samples, and eyewitness accounts, each sparking hope that the Thylacine may still roam in the remote wilderness of Tasmania.

Early Sightings and Evidence Post-1936

In the years following Benjamin's death, the Thylacine was officially declared extinct by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) in 1982. However, rumors of its survival had already begun to surface, with the earliest post-extinction sightings occurring as early as the 1940s. Farmers, hunters, and hikers in Tasmania occasionally reported encounters with striped, dog-like animals that matched the Thylacine’s description. Although many were dismissed as misidentifications of feral dogs, dingoes, or even foxes, the consistency in descriptions kept the hope alive.

One of the most intriguing pieces of potential evidence from these early sightings came in the form of paw prints. These prints, notably different from those of dogs or other known Tasmanian predators, often featured elongated digits and a distinct lack of claw marks. Unlike canines, Thylacines had retractable claws, and the absence of claw marks was seen as a possible sign of their survival. Unfortunately, most prints were found in remote areas and degraded before detailed analyses could be conducted.

The Hans Naarding Sighting (1982)

Among the numerous sightings of the Thylacine, one of the most credible and famous came in 1982, from an experienced wildlife officer named Hans Naarding. His sighting was so remarkable that it reignited global interest in the Thylacine’s possible existence.

Naarding had been conducting a routine survey of wildlife in the Florentine Valley, a dense and remote area of Tasmanian wilderness. It was a cold night, and Naarding was sitting in his truck during a rainstorm when his spotlight caught the reflection of a pair of eyes. He turned the light toward the figure, expecting to see a possum or wallaby, but what he saw left him stunned.

Standing just seven meters away was a large, dog-like animal with distinctive dark stripes across its back—unmistakably a Thylacine. Naarding watched in awe as the creature stood frozen in the light for several seconds before slowly turning and disappearing into the undergrowth.

What made Naarding’s sighting particularly credible was his background: He was a trained wildlife officer with years of experience identifying native species. He had no doubt that what he saw was a Thylacine. He even described a distinctive strong musky odor which was described alongside previous records & sightings of the animal. Naarding immediately reported the sighting, leading to a massive search of the area. However, despite extensive efforts, no further evidence of the Thylacine was found in the Florentine Valley.

This sighting marked a turning point in the Thylacine’s story. The government launched an official investigation, and researchers began placing camera traps in areas with high concentrations of sightings, hoping to catch a glimpse of the elusive creature. Unfortunately, the search yielded little more than blurry photos and ambiguous paw prints

Paw Prints and Other Physical Evidence

Over the years, numerous other reports of Thylacine paw prints have been recorded. In the 1950s, a series of distinctive tracks were discovered near Arthur River in Tasmania's northwest. These prints, which measured around 12 centimeters in length, displayed the same elongated shape and lack of claw marks characteristic of Thylacine tracks. While the prints excited locals and researchers, the area was too remote for further investigation, and no photographs of the prints survive today.

In 1961, farmer Harold Cook claimed to have found a clear set of Thylacine tracks near his property in the Midlands. Cook had grown up hearing stories of the Thylacine and immediately recognized the prints as different from any dog or kangaroo he had encountered. He took plaster casts of the prints, which were later examined by zoologists. Though the prints were never conclusively linked to a Thylacine, their shape and size matched what would be expected from the species.

Another piece of physical evidence surfaced in 1972, when hair samples were found in the bush near Southport, Tasmania. A local biologist examined the hairs and concluded that they did not match any known animal in the region. Unfortunately, further testing was never completed, and the samples were lost before modern DNA analysis could be applied.

Modern Day Sightings and Investigations

Despite the lack of definitive physical evidence, sightings of the Thylacine have continued into the 21st century. In 2017, the Tasmanian Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (DPIPWE) released a report detailing several credible sightings from locals. One particularly intriguing sighting came from a group of tourists who claimed to have spotted a Thylacine while hiking in the Tarkine region. They described a striped, dog-like animal moving swiftly through the underbrush, too fast for them to take a photograph.

Camera traps, often used in wildlife research, have occasionally captured images of strange animals in Tasmania that resemble the Thylacine. In 2020, a controversial video surfaced showing a creature with a stiff tail and elongated snout, features reminiscent of the Thylacine. While some cryptozoologists and enthusiasts hailed the video as proof of the species’ survival, skeptics argued that the animal was more likely a mangy dog or fox.

Why Hasn’t The Thylacine Been Found?

If the Thylacine truly still exists, why has it evaded definitive proof for so long? There are several theories. First, Tasmania’s dense wilderness is vast and largely uninhabited. Many areas remain difficult to access, especially the rugged west coast and the Southwest National Park. It’s conceivable that a small population of Thylacines could survive in these remote regions without being regularly seen by humans.

Additionally, the Thylacine was always a shy and nocturnal creature, avoiding human contact whenever possible. This behavior, combined with the fact that modern sightings are often brief and occur in poor lighting conditions, makes it challenging to obtain clear photographic evidence. The animal’s distinctive stripes and dog-like appearance also contribute to misidentifications.

The Legacy of the Thylacine

Though no definitive evidence has yet surfaced to confirm the survival of the Thylacine, the species remains an enduring symbol of lost wilderness and the importance of conservation. For many, the sightings, paw prints, and stories are reminders of what was lost when the Thylacine disappeared and serve as a call to action to protect other endangered species before they meet the same fate.

Whether the Thylacine still roams the remote wilds of Tasmania or only survives in our imaginations, its story continues to inspire a sense of mystery and wonder. For people like Hans Naarding, and those who still search for the Thylacine today, the possibility of its survival is more than a scientific curiosity—it’s a symbol of hope that not all is lost in the natural world.

That’s the incredible tale of the Thylacine sightings! The paw prints, hairs, and stories like Hans Naarding’s keep the dream alive, and who knows, maybe one day, someone will find proof that this fascinating creature has survived after all.

Back To Top Of Page (Page Will Be Refreshed)